RAG development services & private assistants
Search and question-answering over approved knowledge sources, with retrieval, source references and access boundaries.
JUHENZA provides AI agent development and AI automation services from Gujarat for businesses across India. Our RAG development services cover private document assistants, enterprise AI chatbots and document processing. Each project is scoped around approved business data, access permissions, evaluation criteria and human review. Hosting, model-provider terms, integration access and deployment responsibilities are agreed before a pilot.
Explore an AI automation pilotSearch and question-answering over approved knowledge sources, with retrieval, source references and access boundaries.
Connect model reasoning to defined tools and actions, with approval steps where mistakes carry consequences.
Extract, classify and organize information from documents, with validation and exception handling.
Explore prediction, natural language processing and computer vision where data quality and evaluation support the use case.
A reference document-assisted workflow. Source access, answer generation and action approval remain separate decisions.
Retrieve relevant material from approved sources within the requesting user’s permissions.
Check document freshness, deletion, source ownership and permission enforcement.
Illustrative planning model. Your architecture and deliverables are agreed during scoping.
Index approved sources, retrieve relevant passages and return answers with references while respecting access rules.
A knowledge assistant prototype, ingestion pipeline and an evaluation set built around real questions.
The problem is clear, but the approach is not.
A bounded experiment, findings and a recommendation on what to validate next.
A prototype is not a production-ready service.
You know the workflow and can agree acceptance checks.
Agreed deliverables, verification evidence and operating instructions for the scoped release.
Changes to scope need an explicit decision on cost and timing.
A live system needs focused changes or ongoing care.
A prioritized backlog, reviewed changes and an agreed maintenance or support boundary.
Coverage, response targets and access are agreed per engagement.
Understand the current workflow, available data and how the team will judge a useful result.
Prototype with representative inputs, inspect failures and compare results against an agreed baseline.
Connect the workflow, define review boundaries and prepare monitoring, feedback and handover.
Technology is a scoping decision. These are relevant tools and building blocks to discuss against your existing systems, operating constraints and maintenance needs.
Document parsingRetrievalPermissions
Choose source formats and retrieval behavior around the approved material and each user’s access.
Model APIsNode.jsTypeScript
Compare candidate model behavior on representative tasks before committing to a provider or deployment arrangement.
Evaluation setsLogsReview gates
Define an evaluation process and monitor answer quality, latency and operating cost within the agreed privacy boundaries.
Turn quality expectations into reviewable evidence. The exact checks and responsibilities belong in the project scope.
Evaluate answers against expected results and check that cited passages actually support the answer.
Test restricted documents, missing evidence and unsupported tasks; keep consequential actions behind agreed approvals.
Record evaluation cases and limitations so changes to models, prompts or source data can be reviewed before release.
Practical answers to help turn your idea into a scope everyone understands.
JUHENZA develops bounded AI agents that use approved APIs and tools to support business workflows. Discovery defines the task, tool permissions, human approval gates and recovery behavior. A pilot is evaluated on representative cases before expanding its access or automating consequential actions.
Yes. Our RAG development scope can include document ingestion, version tracking, permission-aware retrieval, source citations and an enterprise chatbot interface. We agree hosting and model-provider data terms, test answer quality and access boundaries, and define what the assistant should do when evidence is missing.
RAG can support questions over approved documents when users need current source material and inspectable references. It requires reliable ingestion, document versions, permission-aware retrieval and evaluation. Fine-tuning may help adapt model behavior, but it does not replace retrieval permissions or a current source of truth.
Integration depends on documented APIs, licensed access and the actions you permit. We scope read-only retrieval separately from actions such as changing records or sending messages, then define approval gates, logs and failure recovery for consequential operations.
The synthetic SOP demo shows source references, unsupported questions and simulated role restrictions. It uses deterministic keyword lookup rather than a live language model, embeddings or production authentication. A real RAG pilot needs separate retrieval, answer-quality and access-control evaluation.
Data handling depends on the selected model provider and deployment. Retention, training use, access controls and hosting requirements must be reviewed and agreed before using your data.
Some low-risk tasks can be automated. Decisions with operational, financial or other significant consequences need boundaries and appropriate review. The design should account for incorrect or incomplete outputs.
Not always. A document assistant may start with a focused set of reliable sources. Custom machine learning may require more representative data; discovery establishes what is feasible.
Bring the problem you want solved. We’ll shape it into a project brief you can keep — or let AI draft a first approach.